Elmar Ejupovic vs Thomas Nicholas Gadecki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recently, Ejupovic's second serve has been more effective, winning 48.78% of points, while Gadecki manages only 20%.
• How do Ejupovic and Gadecki fare in returning their opponent's second serve? Ejupovic leads slightly with 42.36%, compared to Gadecki's 42.11%.
• In terms of first serve returns, Gadecki edges out Ejupovic, with percentages of 21.21% and 20.39% respectively.
• Considering breakpoint resilience, Ejupovic has saved 63.77% of breakpoints, outperforming Gadecki, who saves 50%.
• Over the past year, Ejupovic has a match win rate of 59.02%, whereas Gadecki has an undefeated record of 100% from only three matches.
• Which surface suits each player best? Ejupovic excels on clay with a 56% win rate; Gadecki performs best on hard courts, winning 50%.
• When it comes to tournament levels, both have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Ejupovic has been more active with a 64.1% win rate compared to Gadecki's perfect 100% in fewer matches.
• Examining the caliber of opponents, Ejupovic has faced players with an average rank of 409.52, while Gadecki's opponents have been ranked slightly higher at 367.67.
• In deciding sets, Ejupovic wins 57% of the time, but Gadecki has won all deciding sets recently.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Gadecki has been more successful, converting 50% compared to Ejupovic's 17.86%.

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

With the upcoming tennis match approaching, analyzing the players' recent performances provides valuable insight. Ejupovic demonstrates stronger second serve performance and a higher breakpoint save rate.

In return games, both players are competitive, with Gadecki showing a slight edge in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion. Their recent undefeated streak, albeit over fewer matches, suggests potential underdog vigor.

Considering surface preferences, Ejupovic's clay court strength may play a role, while Gadecki's hard court proficiency may not be as relevant depending on the playing surface.

Both players have succeeded in lower-tier tournaments, but Ejupovic's experience and frequent play could be advantageous. Their ability to win crucial points under pressure and deciding sets could ultimately make the difference.

Given the facts and performance patterns, Ejupovic appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming contest, leveraging overall consistency and experience.